American Studies Blog
Week 12
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1igM1mfzPI
The text selected as representative of a
contemporary version of The Great Gatsby is
the film Casino Jack. The film is
loosely based on a real story and focuses on the career of a political lobbyist called Jack Abramoff who was
eventually charged and imprisoned for fraud in 2006 for conning the Native
Americans out of 85 million dollars. Several
similarities can be found between the two tales; in both, for example the main characters acquire wealth
through illegal means, live lavish lifestyles, but ultimately end up suffering
the consequences as a result of relationships with women and because they have pushed the boundaries. For example, Gatsby’s relationship with Daisy
eventually led to his death and in
a similar manner, the affair of Abramoff’s partner Michael Scanlon with the
stewardess leads to his girlfriend leaking information to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and to Wall Street
journalist Susan Schmidt, resulting in Abramoff’s lies being exposed and his
subsequent imprisonment. The two characters are also involved in the murder of
other people, though in both cases
they are unwilling participants and are not responsible for the crime
themselves.
What both
texts serve to highlight and criticize
is the way that American society is prone to judge success primarily in
terms of money and status. They seem to be suggesting that the
manner in which Americans define
success means that people such as Gatsby and Abramoff, who to an extent have good intentions, end up committing actions
that are corrupt and characterized by lies and manipulation.
So Casino Jack shares
several similarities with The Great
Gatsby and this means it can
be considered to be a contemporary version of the novel. However it is
important to note that as this is a movie, it is probable that it is not an
entirely true representation of all the facts of the Abramoff case and that certain
elements of the film may be skewed or invented
to appeal to the tastes of
the audience. As such it is somewhat problematic to claim it as an accurate
critique of the case and for that matter of American society.